← Project Development & Documentation

Sheet S-117
PPDPDD CE

Steelconcept

Steel lateral systems: moment frame, braced frame, EBF, shear wall

One-line orientation

Steel buildings resist wind and earthquake forces with moment frames, braced frames, shear walls or cores, and sometimes staggered trusses. Compare them by stiffness, ductility, cost, and how much they obstruct the plan.

Key points

  • Moment-resisting frame: uses designated beams, columns, and moment connections in the lateral-force-resisting frame. Other joints in the building may be simple connections.
    • Pros: architecturally open bays (no diagonals), flexible planning.
    • Cons: uses more steel; costly and labor-intensive (many moment connections).
  • (Concentrically) braced frame: diagonal bracing in selected bays.
    • Pros: stiff and efficient; removes the need for moment connections across the whole frame.
    • Cons: braces obstruct openings in the braced bays; limited to those bays.
  • Eccentrically braced frame (EBF): brace deliberately offset from the joint creates a short link beam that yields ductilely.
    • Pros: resists lateral seismic force without buckling the braces; good energy absorption / ductility for earthquake zones.
    • Cons: more complex than a standard braced frame.
  • Shear wall / braced core: solid wall (often concrete) or braced core acting as a deep vertical cantilever.
    • Pros: very effective for high-rise rigidity; typically one per axis to brace both directions.
  • Staggered truss system: story-deep trusses on alternating floors, each carrying the floor above.
    • Pros: maximizes usable floor area and distributes loads efficiently.

Steel lateral systems — two-story bay elevations

Same frame and side load; only the stabilizing element changes

View diagram Hide diagram

Scroll horizontally to explore

Four steel lateral systems compared as equal two-story elevations Four equal two-story steel bay elevations share one grade, bay width, story height, floor levels, and side-load arrow. The moment frame uses rigid haunches and no diagonals, keeping both bays open. The concentrically braced frame uses alternating full-story diagonal braces that make the frame stiff but obstruct openings. The eccentrically braced frame uses chevron braces that land short of center at both levels, leaving directly labeled blue link beams that yield ductilely. The shear wall or core uses solid hatched panels in both stories and is very stiff. A key identifies rigid and pinned joints. sideloadrigid joints · open baysMoment frameopen plan · ductile · more steelconcentric bracesBraced frame (CBF)stiff · braces obstruct openingsyielding link beamsEccentric frame (EBF)stiff + seismic ductilitysolid wall / braced coreShear wall / corevery stiff · high-rise
  • rigid joint
  • pinned joint

A fifth system, the staggered truss, uses story-deep trusses on alternating floors — it maximizes clear floor space and is not drawn here.

Confusions / comparison

SystemHow it resists lateral loadStiffness / ductilityArchitectural impact
Moment frameRigid moment jointsDuctile; less stiff; most steelOpen bays, no diagonals
Concentrically braced frameDiagonal braces at jointsStiff, efficient; less ductileBraces obstruct openings
Eccentrically braced frame (EBF)Braces + yielding link beamStiff + ductile (seismic)Braces present; some openness via link bay
Shear wall / coreSolid wall / braced coreVery stiff/rigidWall occupies the plane; great for high-rise
Staggered trussStory-deep trusses, alternating floorsEfficient load distributionMaximizes clear floor space

→ Steel connections (this module): moment connections enable moment frames; bolted braces build braced frames · Steel shapes and members (this module): the W-shapes, HSS braces, and trusses used · Steel types and production (this module): ductility (low-carbon steel) underpins seismic performance.